|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 06/07/2009 21:59:11
Posts: 2,
Visits: 3
|
|
| This question has proved to be interesting. My two cents worth comes from not only being a coach but as a referee and a referee instructor as well. First point of clarification. The prohibition against a keeper using his/her hands deals with a "deliberate pass" from a teammate. Note well, the law does not say a "deliberate pass back to the keeper." For example, you have a defender who plays a square pass in the penalty area to a fellow defender. The keeper sees an oncoming attacker who is going to get to the ball before the defender and picks up the ball (or plays it with his hands) in the penalty area before the attacker gets to it. Proper call is keeper handling a deliberate pass and an indirect free kick for the attacking team. Second. The laws of the game state that the pass must be deliberate and must be with the feet. Therefore a ball played from the thigh back to the keeper which the keeper handles is not a pass therefore not an infraction of the laws of the game. So, if in the opinion of the referee the defender is not attempting to pass the ball but attempting to do something (like clear it out) then there is no violation. Third. To your point about denial of a goal scoring opportunity and the possibility of a card. As strange as it sounds since a keeper is allowed to use his/her hands within his/her penalty area there is NO possibility of a red/yellow card for a keeper handling a deliberate pass (or throw in) from one of their teammates even if that handling prevents a goal. See my first example. Basically, it is impossible for a keeper to be sanctioned (PK, yellow or red card) for the handling the ball in his penalty area regardless of who plays it. Except for the indirect free kick. Finally, that is a very good you tube clip. Looking at the clip the interpretation from both the Center and the AR must have been given the body position of the defender and the pressure by the attacker player that this was not a deliberate pass but rather an attempt to kick the ball out of trouble. Close but it looks to me like a good no call.
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Member
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 04/09/2009 06:26:12
Posts: 28,
Visits: 172
|
|
Coach Tom (06/07/2009) This question has proved to be interesting. My two cents worth comes from not only being a coach but as a referee and a referee instructor as well.
Second. The laws of the game state that the pass must be deliberate and must be with the feet. Therefore a ball played from the thigh back to the keeper which the keeper handles is not a pass therefore not an infraction of the laws of the game. So, if in the opinion of the referee the defender is not attempting to pass the ball but attempting to do something (like clear it out) then there is no violation.
As a referee and a coach I can tell you the rule and WHY you saw what you did on T.V.
What coach Tom told you is correct. To clarify the second point, what a ref is looking for is a deliberate attempt for a defender to play the ball back to the keeper in a way that does not constitute a backpass. In other words, if the defender is trying to pull a stunt like flicking the ball up in the air and heading it to his goalie, then he will be cautioned for USB and the opposing team will be awarded an IDFK.
What you see on T.V. is probably one of two different scenarios:
1. There is a legitimate heading, chesting, etc to the keeper and instead of picking it up, he traps it and looks upfield for strikers he can deliver it to. He is also waiting to "suck in" an opposing striker or two before he picks it up in order to provide more room for his defense to work the ball out of the back.
2. The ball is deflected off a defender and isn't considered deliberate.
For both scenarios the strategy included in #1 is usually the case. Another strategy is to waste time, since if the goalie hasn't picked up the ball yet, he isn't under any time constraint to kick it. When he picks it up, he has 6 secs or he can be carded for time wasting.
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 04/01/2012 18:00:39
Posts: 1,
Visits: 1
|
|
That is also incorrect the foul occurs when th goalie picks the ball up therefore that is where the free kick is taken from.
It is an indirect free kick meaning that your son could have just let the ball in and no goal would have counted, provided that it was kicked directly to him by the free kick taker.
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 19/01/2012 07:21:01
Posts: 2,
Visits: 2
|
|
|
|
|